Home » Planning » Cost of Living: San Francisco vs Austin (2026)
Tech Corridor Story Updated April 2026 Tax Foundation · BLS · ACS FinCalcs editorial

Cost of Living: San Francisco vs Austin (2026)

Austin saves a $150K earner about $11,250/year in income tax alone vs San Francisco — and rent is 55–60% lower. But Austin's 1.80% effective property tax (one of the highest in any major US metro) eats back a meaningful chunk for buyers, and Austin rents have fallen 19.9% from their 2022 peak. Here's the math at every income.

Try the salary slider

Why this comparison matters in 2026.

The macro picture before the math.

The San Francisco to Austin migration was the defining tech relocation story of 2020-2023, drawing tens of thousands of high-earning workers seeking lower taxes, more housing, and remote-friendly work cultures. The math drove significant initial momentum: California's top marginal rate of 13.3% versus Texas's 0% means a $400K tech worker saves approximately $50,000 annually on state income tax alone. Add the cost-of-living gap and total advantages exceed $80,000 yearly for senior tech compensation.

But the 2024-2026 period has reversed parts of this story. Tech return-to-office mandates pulled many workers back to coastal hubs — Apple, Google, and Meta all required Bay Area presence. Austin's domestic migration dropped 37% in 2024, rents fell 19.9% from the 2022 peak, and median home prices declined approximately 12%. The boom narrative has cooled into something more nuanced: Austin remains attractive long-term, but the velocity has clearly moderated.

For relocators today, several trade-offs sharpen. California's wildfire insurance markets are genuinely collapsing in fire-prone areas — State Farm and Allstate have stopped writing new policies. Texas faces the opposite: hail and severe weather drive insurance premiums higher than California's average for many properties. Property tax flips the rent-versus-buy math: Travis County's 1.80% effective rate exceeds San Francisco's ~1.2% (boosted by Prop 13 protections for long-term owners). FAANG-level total compensation in 2026 runs $400-800K in both cities; the take-home advantage at senior levels still favors Austin substantially. Career sector specifics matter: traditional venture capital and AI/ML research remain heavily Bay Area; SaaS, hardware, and crypto have meaningful Austin presence.

The 30-second answer at $100K salary
San Francisco
$5,908/mo take-home
54% goes to rent ($3,200/mo)
$2,708/mo left
Austin
$6,321/mo take-home
25% goes to rent ($1,550/mo)
$4,771/mo left
Annual difference: $24,756 in Austin's favor.

Take-home estimates use 2026 federal+state brackets, single filer. Excludes pre-tax deductions and 401(k). Source: Tax Foundation, IRS 2026 brackets.

By the numbers.

Quotable stats that make the comparison concrete.

13.3%
California top marginal tax rate
Highest of any state
0%
Texas state income tax rate
Constitutionally protected
$35,000+
Annual savings at $300K SF→Austin
California state tax savings alone
$510K
Austin median home price
Down 12% from 2022 peak
$1.4M+
SF median home price
~3x Austin's median
-37%
Austin domestic migration change 2024
From peak migration era

Try it with your salary.

Drag either slider. Both sides update with after-tax dollars and rent percentages calculated live.

San Francisco, CA
$100,000
Take-home/month$5,913
Rent (1BR)$1,900 (54%)
Disposable/mo$4,013
Austin, TX
$81,000
Take-home/month$6,321
Rent (1BR)$1,500 (24%)
Disposable/mo$4,821
If you earn $100,000 in San Francisco, you only need $81,000 in Austin to maintain the same disposable income.
Run my full take-home calc →

The full breakdown — including taxes.

The current San Francisco-vs-Austin comparisons online skip taxes entirely. They're the biggest variable. Here's everything.

Category San Francisco Austin Difference Why
Housing (1BR rent) $3,200/mo $1,550/mo -52% SF rent 55-60% higher than Austin. Austin rents have FALLEN 19.9% from their 2022 peak due to oversupply (50K new units in 2023-2024) — currently down 6.3% YoY.
State income tax (on $150K) $13,950/yr $0/yr -$13,950 CA top 13.3% (effective ~9.3% at $150K); TX 0%. Take-home gap of ~$11,250 after federal+FICA.
Property tax (on $500K home, new buyer) $3,300/yr $9,000/yr +$5,700 CA 0.66% effective; Austin/Travis County 1.80%. New CA buyer pays $5,700/yr LESS in property tax — a major surprise that flips the tax math for buyers.
Sales tax (on $75K taxable spending) $6,469/yr $6,188/yr -$281 SF 8.625% vs Austin 8.25%. Both exempt groceries. Difference is small.
Groceries (weekly) $145/wk $110/wk -24% BLS Western vs Southern regional CPI Q1 2026.
Transportation (yearly) $1,284/yr $8,400/yr +$7,116 SF Muni/BART monthly $107; many SF residents go car-free. Austin requires car ownership (~$700/mo all-in per AAA). Transportation is the only category where Austin costs MORE.

The transportation row is the surprise. SF Muni/BART monthly $107; many SF residents go car-free. Austin requires car ownership (~$700/mo all-in per AAA). Transportation is the only category where Austin costs MORE. Austin costs $7,116/year more in transportation.

The tax math nobody else shows you.

Three taxes that shape the real comparison. Sources cited inline.

State income tax

San Francisco9.3%graduated 1%-13.3%
Austin0%no state tax

California's top 13.3% bracket is the highest state income tax in the nation. On a $150K salary, Austin saves approximately $11,250/year in income tax. At $500K the gap widens to ~$45,000/year; at $1M+ the gap exceeds $100,000/year. This is the largest tax delta of any major US city pair.

Source: CA Franchise Tax Board, TX Comptroller, Tax Foundation 2026

Property tax

San Francisco (Prop 13 protected)0.66%0.66% effective
Austin (Travis County)1.8%1.80% effective

California's nominal property tax rate (~1.0%) is moderate, but Proposition 13 caps annual assessment increases at 2%. Long-term owners pay tax based on a frozen purchase-year value, while new buyers pay full market rate. Austin's Travis County effective rate of 1.80% is among the highest of any major US city. A $500K home costs ~$3,300/yr in SF (new buyer) vs $9,000/yr in Austin.

Source: CA Proposition 13, Travis Central Appraisal District, Tax Foundation 2026

Sales tax

San Francisco combined8.625%state + city + district
Austin combined8.25%state + transit

SF combined 8.625% (CA 7.25% + SF 1.375%). Austin combined 8.25%. Both exempt groceries and prescription drugs. The sales tax delta is small (~$300/yr on $75K of taxable spending) — far less consequential than the income tax difference.

Source: CA Department of Tax & Fee Administration, TX Comptroller 2026

What if you bought instead?

Live mortgage rate from Freddie Mac PMMS, week of 2026-04-21. Adjust the down payment to see real PITI for both cities.

20% — $72,000 (San Francisco) / $66,000 (Austin)
San Francisco
Median home$1,280,000
Mortgage (P+I)$1,800/mo
Property tax$537/mo
HO insurance$125/mo
Total PITI$2,454/mo
5-yr equity + appreciation+$84,200
30-yr wealth+$612K
Austin
Median home$510,000
Mortgage (P+I)$1,650/mo
Property tax$388/mo
HO insurance$200/mo
Total PITI$2,213/mo
5-yr equity + appreciation+$71,400
30-yr wealth+$498K
Austin has been appreciating faster (5.4% vs 3.8% historical 5-year), making it the wealth-building winner short-to-medium term. Long-term forecasts depend on local fundamentals.

Break-even on moving costs

If Austin wins by ~$2,063/month, how long until the move pays itself back?

$7,800
Break-even:
4 months
At $2,063/mo advantage to Austin, a $7,800 move pays back in ~4 months. After that, you keep the savings.

Move cost source: Average household move cost SF→Austin (~1,750 miles) per AAA 2026; cross-country premium applies. Excludes lost work time, deposits, broker fees.

Mortgage rates: 30-year 6.37%, 15-year 5.65%. TX insurance higher due to hail/severe-weather risk. CA homeowners face wildfire insurance volatility — many areas now require state FAIR Plan (more expensive, less coverage). Appreciation projection uses 3% conservative forward estimate. Past performance not indicative of future returns.
Run mortgage affordability for both cities →

Which city is right for you?

Five questions. Each answer scores points for one city. The right answer depends heavily on income level and career situation.

1 of 5
Income level (this drives most of the math)
2 of 5
Transportation preference
3 of 5
Career sector
4 of 5
Housing situation
5 of 5
What matters most

Which one wins for who?

The right answer depends heavily on income, housing situation, and career sector:

Reader profile Winner Confidence Why
Single, $90K, renting outer SF/East Bay Tied Low At lower incomes, CA effective tax is moderate; SF transit + amenities offset the gap
Single, $180K, tech/startup Austin Very High Tax savings ~$15K/yr + dramatically lower rent; classic relocation profile
Couple, $400K, both in tech Austin Very High Combined tax savings $40K-$50K/yr; Austin home cost saves $770K vs SF
FAANG senior engineer, $400K total comp San Francisco Moderate Equity comp + role density may exceed tax delta; case-by-case
Long-term SF homeowner (pre-2015) San Francisco Very High Prop 13 frozen assessment makes leaving costly; capital gains exposure on sale
New SF buyer at median $1.28M Austin High Austin home costs 60% less; even with higher property tax, monthly carrying is dramatically lower
Family of 4, $200K, suburbs Austin Very High Round Rock/Cedar Park housing value + lower childcare costs
Retiree, $150K mostly capital gains + SS Austin High TX no state tax on retirement income or capital gains; CA hits both
Climate-sensitive lifestyle priority San Francisco High SF year-round mild; Austin extreme summers + intensifying storms

Confidence is editorial judgment, not a precise statistical estimate. "Very High" = the math is decisive; "Low" = the answer depends heavily on factors specific to your situation.

When the standard verdict flips.

The headline verdict (Austin saves a $150K earner ~$11K/yr) is the average. Here's when the math flips.

San Francisco becomes the better choice if:
  • Career in big tech with FAANG-level RSU comp
    Apple, Google, Meta, NVIDIA, OpenAI — most still require physical presence. Career upside in equity comp can dwarf the entire tax delta. A senior SWE earning $400K total comp pays ~$45K more in CA tax but might earn $50K-$100K more than the Austin equivalent role.
  • Long-term homeowner protected by Prop 13
    If you bought before 2015, your assessed value is frozen far below market. Effective property tax rate could be 0.3-0.5% — far cheaper than Austin's 1.80%. Selling and buying in TX would lose this protection forever.
  • No-car lifestyle preference
    SF's Muni + BART + walkable neighborhoods make car-free living realistic. Austin's car-dependency adds $8,400/yr. For a non-driver, SF can be cheaper to operate.
  • Year-round mild climate priority
    SF averages 50-70°F year-round with rare extremes. Austin sees 100°F+ for 25+ days/year and increasingly intense storms. For climate-sensitive lifestyle, SF wins decisively.
Austin becomes the better choice if:
  • Salary $100K-$500K, especially with remote-friendly employer
    The sweet spot for Austin advantage. Tax savings ($11K-$45K/yr) plus dramatically lower rent stack cleanly. Above $500K, the advantage explodes further. Most relocation calculators apply here.
  • Buying as a new buyer (no Prop 13 protection)
    Austin median $510K vs SF $1.28M — that's $770K less debt. Even with Austin's 1.80% property tax (vs SF's 0.66% for new buyers), monthly carrying cost is dramatically lower. Cash flow improves immediately.
  • Family with kids, suburban preference
    Austin's outer suburbs (Round Rock, Cedar Park, Leander, Lakeway) deliver dramatically more sqft per dollar plus highly-rated school districts. SF Bay equivalents (Palo Alto, Marin) cost 4-6x for similar quality.
  • Tech career outside FAANG, especially startup or remote
    Austin's startup ecosystem ('Silicon Hills') is real — Tesla, Oracle, Indeed, BigCommerce, hundreds of YC alumni. For career trajectories outside the big-tech RSU machine, Austin compensates well, costs much less, and has growing VC presence.

What you are accepting either way.

Both choices have real downsides. Here's the asymmetric risk:

If you choose San Francisco, you are accepting:
  • Massive tax drag. CA's 13.3% top bracket means a $500K earner pays ~$45K more in CA than they would in TX every single year. Over a decade, that's $450K+ in foregone wealth.
  • Prop 13 lottery. If you don't already own SF property, you're a 'new buyer' paying full assessed value forever. Long-term owners pay a fraction of what you pay for the same house.
  • Wildfire insurance volatility. Many SF Bay neighborhoods have lost private insurance coverage. State FAIR Plan is more expensive and covers less. Insurance can become unobtainable in some areas.
  • Commute math. Bay Area median commute exceeds 40 minutes. If you live in SF and work in South Bay, you may spend 2-3 hours daily on transportation.
If you choose Austin, you are accepting:
  • Property tax shock. Travis County's 1.80% effective rate means a $500K home costs $9,000/yr in property tax — nearly 3x what a new SF buyer pays. Buyers often miss this.
  • Forced car dependency. CapMetro covers limited routes. Most Austin residents need vehicles. ~$8,400/yr all-in. If you're a city walker, this is a lifestyle downgrade you may not realize until year 2.
  • Climate trajectory. 100°F+ summers extending. Texas grid stress (the 2021 winter storm + ongoing summer load issues). Insurance is rising due to hail and severe weather.
  • Career ceiling outside startups. If you're in big tech (FAANG-level), Austin's job market is real but smaller. Senior roles at major-name companies are scarcer than Bay Area equivalents.

How sensitive is this answer? Extremely — the most income-dependent of any pair.

  • Change the salary from $100K to $500K, and Austin's annual advantage explodes from ~$8K to ~$45K.
  • Change renting to buying as a new SF resident, and CA's Prop 13 effect can make SF property tax LOWER than Austin — flipping the housing math.
  • Change buying as a long-term SF owner (pre-2015), and SF wins decisively on housing carrying cost.
  • Account for wildfire insurance crisis, and SF homeowners may face $5K-$10K/yr in coverage costs that Austin buyers don't.
  • If your career is FAANG-equivalent equity comp, the income tax delta becomes a smaller fraction of total compensation — Austin's advantage shrinks proportionally.

Five things that surprise people.

The framings most cost-of-living tools never mention. All sourced.

A $150K earner saves $11,250/year in income tax alone moving from SF to Austin.

California's progressive bracket structure hits hardest at 13.3% (top bracket) and stays high through middle brackets — effective rate at $150K is roughly 9.3%. Texas has zero state income tax. The gap widens with income: $250K saves ~$22K/yr; $500K saves ~$45K/yr; $1M saves ~$130K/yr. This is the largest tax delta of any major US city pair we cover.

Source: CA Franchise Tax Board, TX Comptroller, SmartAsset state-by-state analysis →

California's Proposition 13 inverts property-tax math for long-term owners.

Prop 13 (1978) caps annual assessment increases at 2%. A homeowner who bought their SF house in 1995 for $300K pays property tax on a frozen ~$540K assessed value — about $3,560/yr — while their neighbor who bought identical property today at $1.8M pays $11,880/yr. New CA buyers DON'T get Prop 13 protection at purchase. Compare to Austin: Travis County's 1.80% effective rate applies fully to current market value with only a 10%/yr appraisal cap. A new $500K home: ~$3,300/yr in CA vs $9,000/yr in Austin.

Source: California State Board of Equalization, Travis Central Appraisal District →

Austin rents have FALLEN 19.9% from their 2022 peak — the largest correction in any major US metro.

Austin's pandemic boom drove rents up 33% from January 2021 to August 2022. Builders responded with 957 apartment permits per 100,000 residents (the highest rate nationally), adding ~50,000 units in 2023-2024. Vacancy soared from 3.96% to 9.92% by April 2025. Average 2BR rent fell from $1,725 to $1,382. As of January 2026, Austin rents are down 6.3% year-over-year — currently the softest major rental market nationally. SF rents have remained sticky.

Source: Austin Apartment Locators rental tracking January 2026 →

Austin requires a car. SF doesn't. This single fact swings transportation costs by $7,000/year.

SF's Muni and BART let many residents go car-free; the monthly transit pass is $107. Austin's CapMetro covers limited routes; the metro is functionally car-dependent for most jobs. AAA estimates ~$700/month for car ownership all-in (insurance, gas, maintenance, depreciation). For a non-driver, SF can actually be cheaper to operate than Austin. This is one of two categories (alongside property tax for new buyers) where Austin costs MORE.

Source: AAA Your Driving Costs 2025, SFMTA fare schedule 2026, CapMetro fare schedule 2026 →

Net migration from California to Austin has cooled 37% — return-to-office mandates blunted the wave.

Austin's pandemic-era reputation as 'Silicon Hills' drove explosive growth: net domestic migration peaked in 2021-2022. By 2024, that flow had dropped 37%, primarily because remote work mandates pulled tech workers back to Bay Area offices. The Austin-from-California pipeline is no longer growing — it's reverting to peer-city status. For relocators today, Austin is still the better financial play above $100K, but it's no longer the escape valve it was during 2020-2022.

Source: US Census migration data, Austin Apartment Locators 2026 analysis →

Take this further.

Three tools that turn this comparison into a plan.

Run your take-home calc
Pre-filled: $100K San Francisco vs $81K Austin. See your exact numbers.
Mortgage affordability
See what you can afford to buy in each city. Tax + insurance baked in.
Take the financial checkup
Get an A+ to F score across 7 areas before relocating. 4 minutes.

Compare more cities.

Smart picks based on the same lens.

SF vs Seattle

Two West Coast tech hubs compared

SF vs Portland

California to Oregon: tax structure flip

Austin vs Nashville

Two no-tax-state Sunbelt hubs

Austin vs Dallas

Two Texas metros compared

NYC vs Miami

The classic high-tax to no-tax migration

Chicago vs Dallas

Midwest to Texas: similar tax flip

Take the next step.

Calculators and tools that extend this comparison with your specific numbers.

Mortgage affordability calculator
Run the buy-vs-rent math for San Francisco or Austin with your specific salary and down payment.
Take-home pay calculator
Federal + state breakdown for any salary level. Compare CA vs TX take-home in detail.
Emergency fund calculator
Determine how much you need based on San Francisco or Austin cost of living.
Retirement projections
Account for state tax differences in long-term savings projections.
State tax comparison tool
Side-by-side California vs Texas tax breakdown across income levels.
Property tax calculator
Estimate annual property tax bills at different home values — critical for San Francisco/Austin comparison.
Methodology & sources

Page last reviewed: 2026-04-24. Next scheduled update: 2026-07-01.

Take-home pay calculations use 2026 federal tax brackets (single filer, standard deduction) plus the relevant state rate. They exclude pre-tax retirement contributions (401(k), HSA, FSA) and most local taxes that vary by employer.

Cost-of-living indexes use ACER (American Chamber of Commerce Researchers) and BLS regional CPI as primary sources, weighted across housing, groceries, utilities, transportation, healthcare, and miscellaneous categories.

Property tax figures are effective rates (median bill ÷ median home value) at the county level. They differ from nominal/posted millage rates because of homestead exemptions and assessment caps.

Mortgage projections assume 30-year fixed at the rate shown, conservative 3% annual appreciation, and standard PITI calculations. Past appreciation does not guarantee future returns.

Sources used in this comparison:

  • Tax Foundation 2026 — State Tax Climate Index
  • CA Franchise Tax Board 2026
  • TX Comptroller 2026
  • Travis Central Appraisal District 2026
  • BLS Q1 2026 — Metropolitan Area Wages
  • ACS 5-Year 2024 — American Community Survey
  • Zillow Home Value Index April 2026
  • Numbeo COL Plus Rent Index 2026
  • Austin Apartment Locators rental tracking 2026
  • California Proposition 13 (1978)

All figures are estimates for general planning. Your specific situation depends on filing status, dependents, deductions, employer benefits, and neighborhood-specific costs. Use the linked FinCalcs tools for personalized calculations. Not financial or tax advice.

Frequently asked questions.

Real questions readers ask about San Francisco vs Austin.

How much do tech workers actually save moving from SF to Austin?
On a $300K salary, expect roughly $35,000/yr in California state income tax savings (Texas 0% vs CA top brackets 9.3-13.3%). At $1M (FAANG-level total comp), savings exceed $130,000/yr. Cost of living is also ~30-40% lower in Austin. The total advantage compounds significantly over a career.
Why has Austin migration slowed in 2024-2026?
Tech return-to-office mandates pulled workers back to coastal hubs. Austin's domestic migration dropped 37% in 2024. Rents fell 19.9% from 2022 peak. This created a softer rental market in Austin but also signaled the post-pandemic boom was correcting. Austin remains attractive long-term, but the velocity has clearly cooled.
Is Proposition 13 really that beneficial for SF homeowners?
For long-term owners, yes. Prop 13 caps annual property tax increases at 2% for homeowners who don't sell. Owners who bought in the 1990s or earlier pay property tax on assessed values dramatically below current market — sometimes 80-90% below. This creates a strong financial incentive to never sell. New buyers face full market-rate property tax (~1.2% effective).
Are California's wildfire insurance markets really collapsing?
In high-risk areas, yes. State Farm, Allstate, and other major insurers have stopped writing new policies in California, citing wildfire losses. The state's FAIR Plan (insurer of last resort) is increasingly the only option for many homes. Premiums have doubled or tripled in fire-prone neighborhoods. Texas has hail/wind exposure but the market remains competitive.
What's FAANG-level compensation actually look like in Austin vs SF?
Senior FAANG-level total compensation runs $400K-$800K in both cities. The base salary is similar; cost-of-living adjustments to compensation favor SF (~10-15% more for the same role). But Austin's lack of state income tax creates a $40K-$80K advantage on take-home for senior comp. Net: Austin is meaningfully better for take-home at senior levels.
Is Austin still affordable for non-tech workers?
Less affordable than it was. Austin median home price is $510K (down from $580K peak); median rent ~$1,750/mo. For non-tech salaries ($60K-$90K), housing is genuinely tight. Suburbs like Round Rock and Pflugerville offer more affordable options but require longer commutes.
How does Texas property tax compare to California?
Texas property tax is dramatically higher — Austin's Travis County effective rate is 1.80% vs San Francisco's ~1.2%. On a $700K home: Austin $12,600/yr vs SF ~$8,400/yr. Texas has homestead caps on assessment increases (10%/yr); California has Prop 13's 2%/yr cap. The structures differ — California protects long-term owners; Texas treats all owners similarly.